AI Algorithms Catalogue
Legit.Health operates 59 distinct AI models in production, covering diagnosis support, severity quantification across 20+ clinical scales, wound assessment, surface segmentation, lesion detection, and phenotype classification. This catalogue summarises every model currently deployed in the platform. For clinical validation studies and peer-reviewed publications backing these models, see the Clinical Evidence page.
Many algorithms in this catalogue were developed or significantly improved since seed close (Q4 2024). The specific list of post-seed additions is being finalised internally and will be marked with 🆕 badges in a subsequent update of this page.
1. Diagnosis Support
2. Severity Intensity Quantification (visual signs)
Ordinal classification on a 0-9 scale for 10 distinct clinical visual signs. These are the foundational building blocks of composite clinical scales (PASI, EASI, SCORAD, GPPGA, PPPASI, ODS).
| # | Visual sign | Category | Clinical scales supported |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Erythema | Inflammatory | PASI · EASI · SCORAD · GPPGA · PPPASI |
| 2 | Desquamation | Morphological | PASI · GPPGA · PPPASI |
| 3 | Induration | Textural | PASI |
| 4 | Pustule | Lesion-type | PPPASI · GPPGA · Acne |
| 5 | Crusting | Morphological | EASI · SCORAD |
| 6 | Xerosis | Textural | EASI · SCORAD · ODS |
| 7 | Swelling | Inflammatory | EASI · SCORAD |
| 8 | Oozing | Inflammatory | EASI · SCORAD |
| 9 | Excoriation | Morphological | EASI · SCORAD |
| 10 | Lichenification | Textural | EASI · SCORAD |
Lead: Daniel Dagnino. Output format: ordinal 0-9 + continuous confidence score.
3. Wound Assessment (binary classification)
Wound care has been a major expansion area. 22 binary classifiers cover the AWOSI framework, NPUAP staging, TIME framework, and infection surveillance.
Wound edges (6 models)
| # | Model | Detects |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perilesional Erythema | Inflammation around wound |
| 2 | Damaged Edges | Compromised wound margins |
| 3 | Delimited Edges | Well-defined boundaries |
| 4 | Diffuse Edges | Poorly defined boundaries |
| 5 | Thickened Edges | Hyperkeratotic / rolled edges |
| 6 | Indistinguishable Edges | Severely compromised edges |
Exudate characterisation (5 models)
| # | Model | Detects |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Perilesional Maceration | Moisture damage in periwound skin |
| 8 | Fibrinous Exudate | Normal healing response indicator |
| 9 | Purulent Exudate | Infection indicator |
| 10 | Bloody Exudate | Tissue fragility / hemorrhage |
| 11 | Serous Exudate | Clear/watery exudate |
Wound tissue assessment (11 models)
| # | Model | Detects |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Biofilm-Compatible Tissue | Biofilm presence indicators |
| 13 | Affected Tissue: Bone | Bone involvement / osteomyelitis risk |
| 14 | Affected Tissue: Subcutaneous | Partial-thickness loss |
| 15 | Affected Tissue: Muscle | Muscle involvement |
| 16 | Affected Tissue: Intact Skin | Stage I pressure injury |
| 17 | Affected Tissue: Dermis-Epidermis | Partial-thickness skin loss |
| 18 | Wound Bed: Necrotic | Necrotic tissue presence |
| 19 | Wound Bed: Closed | Healed vs open |
| 20 | Wound Bed: Granulation | Healthy granulation |
| 21 | Wound Bed: Epithelial | Epithelialisation phase |
| 22 | Wound Bed: Slough | Devitalised tissue |
Lead: Daniel Dagnino. Use cases: AWOSI scoring, NPUAP staging, debridement planning, infection detection, healing prognosis.
4. Wound Staging & Composite Scores (2 models)
5. Surface Quantification (segmentation models, 13)
Pixel-level segmentation for surface area measurement. Outputs include percentage, absolute area (cm² when calibration available), and clinical alerts.
| # | Model | Application |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Body Surface Segmentation | 5-class (Head/Neck, Upper Extremities, Trunk, Lower Extremities) for BSA calculation. PASI/EASI/Burn assessment. |
| 2 | Erythema Surface | Wound erythema area + perilesional. Infection surveillance, AWOSI. |
| 3 | Wound Bed Surface | Total wound area + perimeter + max length/width. Healing rate. |
| 4 | Granulation Tissue Surface | Healing progression indicator. AWOSI, wound bed preparation. |
| 5 | Biofilm and Slough Surface | Debridement guidance. TIME framework. |
| 6 | Necrosis Surface | Urgent debridement indicator. Infection risk. |
| 7 | Maceration Surface | Moisture management. Dressing selection. |
| 8 | Orthopedic Material Surface | Exposed hardware detection. Surgical revision alerts. |
| 9 | Bone/Cartilage/Tendon Surface | Deep structure exposure. Osteomyelitis risk. Amputation risk. |
| 10 | Hair Loss Surface | 3-class (Hair, No Hair, Non-Scalp). SALT, APULSI scoring. |
| 11 | Nail Lesion Surface | NAPSI, OSI scoring. |
| 12 | Hypopigmentation / Depigmentation Surface | VASI, VETF. Vitiligo assessment. |
| 13 | Hyperpigmentation Surface | MASI, mMASI. Melasma + PIH assessment. |
Lead: Daniel Dagnino (most) + Ignacio Hernández (nail).
6. Lesion Detection (object detection, 5 models)
Object detection (YOLO architecture) for individual lesion counting and localisation. Bounding boxes + confidence scores.
7. Phenotype & Pattern Classification (2 models)
8. Operational / Non-clinical Models (5)
Pipeline and quality assurance models that enable the rest of the platform to operate at clinical-grade reliability.
| # | Model | Function |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | DIQA (Dermatology Image Quality Assessment) | 0-10 quality score with dimension subscores. Telemedicine + quality control. Published JAAD 2023. |
| 2 | Domain Validation | Multi-class: non-skin / skin clinical / skin dermoscopic. Image routing. |
| 3 | Skin Surface Segmentation | Binary skin region detection. Preprocessing, ROI extraction. |
| 4 | Body Surface Segmentation | 5-class anatomical regions. BSA calculation (clinical use, listed in §5 above). |
| 5 | Head Detection | Privacy protection + patient counting + multi-patient flag. |
Leads: Ignacio Hernández (DIQA, Domain Validation), Alberto Sabater (Skin Surface, Head Detection).
Strategic implications for investors
★ The technical moat in one diagram ─────────
| Competitor | Approximate model count | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Legit.Health | 59 | Multi-pathology platform · 22+ clinical scales |
| Skin Analytics | ~1 | Melanoma detection only |
| DermaSensor (FDA cleared) | ~1 | Skin cancer detection only |
| SkinVision | 1-2 | Skin cancer self-screening |
| MetaOptima (DermEngine) | 3-5 | Diagnosis support + analysis |
Building a multi-pathology platform with 59 distinct models requires 3-5 years of catch-up investment in data, annotation, and clinical validation. This is the durable technical moat that justifies higher valuation multiples vs. single-purpose competitors.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────
Pipeline coverage map by clinical area
| Therapeutic area | Models supporting this area | Clinical scales |
|---|---|---|
| Psoriasis | 4 (intensity) + 1 segmentation | PASI · PPPASI · GPPGA |
| Atopic dermatitis | 7 (intensity) + 1 segmentation | EASI · SCORAD · ODS |
| Hidradenitis suppurativa | 1 detection (4 classes) + 2 phenotype | IHS4 · Martorell · Hurley · HS-PGA |
| Acne | 2 detection + 1 intensity | GAGS · IGA · ALADIN |
| Urticaria | 1 detection | UAS7 · UCT · AUAS |
| Wound care | 22 binary + 1 stage + 1 composite + 7 segmentation | AWOSI · NPUAP · TIME framework |
| Alopecia | 1 detection + 1 segmentation | SALT · APULSI |
| Nail diseases | 1 segmentation | NAPSI · OSI |
| Vitiligo | 1 segmentation | VASI · VETF |
| Melasma / PIH | 1 segmentation | MASI · mMASI |
| Skin cancer | ICD diagnosis + binary indicators | Triage urgency |
| Quality control | DIQA · Domain · Skin Surface · Head Detection | — |
See also
- Clinical Evidence: 7 peer-reviewed papers + 10-paper pipeline validating these algorithms
- Medical Device Certification: regulatory framework for these models
- Commercial Metrics: pharma + clinical use cases enabled by each algorithm